Abstract: Keine sechs Jahre nach dem Ende des Holocaust schrieb Theodor W. Adorno, einer der bekanntesten Vertreter der Kritischen Theorie, in seiner Schrift Minima Moralia: „Der Antisemitismus ist das Gerücht über die Juden.“ Der Philosoph und Soziologe wollte mit dieser schlichten Definition das formulieren, was kennzeichnend für den
Antisemitismus ist und sich häufig hinter der Verbreitung von Verschwörungsideologien verbirgt: Das Konstruieren einer homogenen Gruppe, der pauschal negative Eigenschaften zugeschrieben werden. Das Wort „Gerücht“ drückt zugleich etwas „Heimliches“ aus, etwas, das im Verborgenen passiert. Ein Geheimnis also, von dem nicht alle
Menschen wissen sollen oder dürfen. Sogenannte Verschwörungsmythen kommen selten ohne Antisemitismus aus – und umgekehrt. Das zeigen nicht zuletzt aktuelle verschwörungs- ideologische Diskurse um SARS-CoV-2. Wie das
Virus, so breiten sich weltweit in ebenso rasanter Geschwindigkeit Geschichten um dessen Herkunft und Ursprung aus. Das „Gerücht“, nach dem die Krankheit von einer geheimen Macht erfunden worden oder harmlos sei, glauben in den USA viele Menschen bis hin zum amtierenden Präsidenten Donald Trump, und sie haben inzwischen auch in Deutschland Hochkonjunktur. Insbesondere die extreme Rechte versucht, sich diesen Verschwörungsmythos zunutze zu machen. So entwickelte sich von den Vereinigten Staaten ausgehend ein neues Phänomen, das zum Synonym für viele Verschwörungsideologien wurde. Das Schlagwort hinter diesem Phänomen lautet:
QAnon.
Abstract: Wie zeigt sich Antisemitismus auf Versammlungen im öffentlichen Raum? Welche Parolen, Symbole und Narrative treten wiederholt auf? Und was bedeutet es für Jüdinnen und Juden, wenn gewaltverherrlichende und delegitimierende Sprache auf Demonstrationen normalisiert wird? Diesen Fragen geht die neue Veröffentlichung „Lagebild Antisemitismus. Feldbeobachtung im öffentlichen Raum“ nach. Sie bündelt eigene Beobachtungen von 76 Versammlungen aus dem ersten Halbjahr 2026, in dem das JFDA insgesamt 329 antisemitische Vorfälle dokumentiert hat. Im Mittelpunkt steht dabei nicht der isolierte Vorfall, sondern die Frage, welche Muster sich über verschiedene Versammlungen hinweg zeigen und fachlich einordnen lassen.
Das Lagebild macht sichtbar, dass die Bewertung einer Versammlung nicht bei der Frage endet, ob sie polizeilich als friedlich gilt. Entscheidend ist vielmehr, welche Inhalte im öffentlichen Raum wiederholt artikuliert werden, welche Feindbilder sie transportieren und welche Wirkung sie auf jüdische Sichtbarkeit, demokratische Öffentlichkeit und zivilgesellschaftliche Beobachtung entfalten. Bei den Feldbeobachtungen zeigten sich dabei vor allem die Dämonisierung und Delegitimierung Israels, entmenschlichende Zuschreibungen, Gewalt- und Vernichtungssemantik, NS-Vergleiche und Umkehrungen der Schoa-Erinnerung sowie verschwörungsideologische Erzählungen. Die Veröffentlichung richtet sich an Öffentlichkeit, Zivilgesellschaft, politische Bildung, Medien und zuständige Stellen. Sie bietet eine Grundlage, um antisemitische Dynamiken auf Versammlungen nicht nur punktuell wahrzunehmen, sondern in ihren wiederkehrenden Formen, Anschlussfähigkeiten und Wirkungen einzuordnen. Zugleich verdeutlicht sie, dass eine kontinuierliche, quellengebundene Feldbeobachtung notwendig bleibt, um solche Entwicklungen nachvollziehbar zu dokumentieren und über einzelne Ereignisse hinaus vergleichbar zu machen.
Abstract: This paper examines the adaptation and proliferation of antisemitic narratives on Telegram during the Russian-Ukrainian war, tracing their evolution from historical myths to digital propaganda. Through a qualitative analysis of Telegram channels in Russian and Ukrainian, we explore how classical antisemitic tropes such as conspiracy theories about Jewish global control, Holocaust denial, and accusations of dual loyalty are repurposed to shift blame for the war onto Jews. Our findings reveal a multilayered process of blame-shifting operating across historical, social, national, and global levels, positioning Jews as instigators of conflict to deflect civic and political responsibility from Russians and Ukrainians. We argue that this antisemitic rhetoric serves as a tool of social manipulation and political deflection, embedded in diverse nationalist and conspiratorial digital environments. By embedding these narratives within Telegram’s unregulated and virally oriented ecosystem, content creators amplify prejudice, erode social cohesion, and perpetuate cycles of mistrust and scapegoating. This study highlights the enduring power of antisemitic myths in contemporary digital conflict narratives and calls for further research into the structural mechanisms enabling their spread.
Abstract: Les Juifs ont souvent été accusés de pratiquer le « meurtre rituel » : de la judéophobie antique à l’antisionisme radical d’aujourd’hui, en passant par l’antisémitisme racial moderne, cette accusation mensongère s’est traduite par des légendes qui n’ont cessé de susciter des mobilisations politiques et des violences meurtrières (émeutes sanglantes, pogromes, attentats terroristes). Ces récits de meurtres, qui stimulent la haine, permettent la criminalisation d’un peuple tout entier : les Juifs. Un peuple imaginé comme étant constitué d’assassins potentiels. La haine des Juifs n’a certainement rien inventé de pire.
Pierre-André Taguieff, à travers l’analyse de nombreux exemples, montre que cette accusation n’a cessé, au cours de l’histoire, d’être reformulée dans des contextes très différents, et qu’elle est la matrice d’un enseignement de la haine destiné à susciter de l’indignation. En se diffusant massivement sur Internet, ces récits diffamatoires préparent le passage au « tout est permis » contre les Juifs, et ainsi justifient les actions les plus violentes contre eux. L’examen critique de ces récits offre au lecteur les moyens de démonter les mensonges d’une propagande judéophobe qui s’est globalisée.Les Juifs ont souvent été accusés de pratiquer le « meurtre rituel » : de la judéophobie antique à l’antisionisme radical d’aujourd’hui, en passant par l’antisémitisme racial moderne, cette accusation mensongère s’est traduite par des légendes qui n’ont cessé de susciter des mobilisations politiques et des violences meurtrières (émeutes sanglantes, pogromes, attentats terroristes). Ces récits de meurtres, qui stimulent la haine, permettent la criminalisation d’un peuple tout entier : les Juifs. Un peuple imaginé comme étant constitué d’assassins potentiels. La haine des Juifs n’a certainement rien inventé de pire.
Pierre-André Taguieff, à travers l’analyse de nombreux exemples, montre que cette accusation n’a cessé, au cours de l’histoire, d’être reformulée dans des contextes très différents, et qu’elle est la matrice d’un enseignement de la haine destiné à susciter de l’indignation. En se diffusant massivement sur Internet, ces récits diffamatoires préparent le passage au « tout est permis » contre les Juifs, et ainsi justifient les actions les plus violentes contre eux. L’examen critique de ces récits offre au lecteur les moyens de démonter les mensonges d’une propagande judéophobe qui s’est globalisée.
Abstract: This joint report from HOPE not hate and Antisemitism Policy Trust explores the overlap and interplay between antisemitism and misogyny in a series of articles, case studies and social media analysis.
The report investigates the ways in which antifeminism and misogyny can act as slip roads towards antisemitism and other forms of racism, due to a perceived loss of status among white men – and women – based on gender and racial hierarchies. In recent years, the antisemitic far right, in particular, has become increasingly adept at steering antipathy to feminism and women more broadly towards Jew-hatred, reasserting men’s status at the expense of others.
It also outlines the role of conspiracy theories in bridging anti-feminism and antisemitism, in particular the “Cultural Marxism” and “White Genocide” ideologies that implicitly or explicitly position Jews as the root of feminism and women’s behaviour in general. Such theories can provide a grand context for personal frustrations and prejudices, as well as scapegoats.
We explore the ways in which Jewish people are gendered in antisemitic discourse, outlining longstanding stereotypes of Jewish men and particularly Jewish women who, being on the receiving end of both antisemitism and misogyny, are the targets of especially vile abuse.
We also look into the important, but precarious, role of women in antisemitic movements as recruiters and propagandists, including several of the UK’s best-known Holocaust deniers. Women can play a conscious role in “softening” extreme prejudice, although they can also quickly become targets for abuse themselves.
This report also includes an analysis of misogyny and gender politics on the messaging app Telegram, a key online hub for the antisemitic far right. We found that open misogyny is widespread and enabled within antisemitic spaces on the platform. Attacks on gay men are especially commonplace, which itself indicates the heterosexual male dominance of these spaces. Sexual assault is a prominent theme, and whilst it is discussed in a variety of ways, pro-rape comments are not uncommon.
Abstract: Das vorliegende zivilgesellschaftliche Lagebild der Recherche- und Informationsstelle Antisemitismus Berlin (RIAS Berlin) dokumentiert antisemitische Vorfälle im Jahr 2025 und analysiert deren Erscheinungsformen und Entwicklungen. Ziel des Berichts ist es, auf Grundlage systematisch erhobener und verifizierter Meldungen ein möglichst umfassendes Bild antisemitischer Dynamiken in Berlin zu zeichnen und ihre Auswirkungen auf Betroffene sichtbar zu machen.
2197 antisemitische Vorfälle hat RIAS Berlin 2025 in Berlin dokumentiert. Die von RIAS Berlin dokumentierten Daten zeigen, dass antisemitische Vorfälle in Berlin seit dem 7. Oktober 2023 stark angestiegen sind; das hohe Vorfallaufkommen hielt auch im Jahr 2025 an. Obwohl bei einzelnen Vofalltypen, etwa bei Angriffen und gezielten Sachbeschädigungen, gegenüber 2024 weniger Vorfälle bekannt geworden sind, liegen die Gesamtzahlen weiterhin deutlich über dem Niveau der Jahre vor 2023.
Die Erfahrungen der Betroffenen bilden die Grundlage für diesen Bericht. Sie verweisen nicht nur auf einzelne Vorfälle, sondern auf ein gesellschaftliches Klima, in dem antisemitische Äußerungen und Handlungen möglich sind – und zu oft unwidersprochen bleiben. Antisemitische Vorfälle sind keine isolierten Ereignisse. Die Auseinandersetzung mit antisemitischen Erfahrungen, (er-)fordert Ressourcen: zeitliche, soziale, politische, emotionale, psychische, wirtschaftliche.
Auch im Falle einer juristischen Auseinandersetzung sind nicht nur finanzielle Mittel erforderlich. Ein solcher Prozess bedeutet mitunter, sich immer wieder mit dem antisemitischen Erlebnis auseinanderzusetzen, die Erfahrung nicht abschließen zu können. Ähnliches gilt für die oft langwierigen und zehrenden Auseinandersetzungen an Hochschulen oder am Arbeitsplatz um sichere Räume für Jüdinnen_Juden oder auch darum, dass Antisemitismus überhaupt erkannt oder anerkannt wird.
Auffällig ist die feindliche Deutung des Begriffs „Zionismus“. Im antisemitischen Diskurs wird er zu einer politischen Markierung, die Zionismus u.a. mit Faschismus und Nationalsozialismus gleichsetzt und zur Feindzuschreibung macht. Seit 2023 weist RIAS Berlin auf Vorfälle hin, in denen diese Zuschreibung auf bekannte antisemitische Stereotype zurückgreift. Das Feindbild „Zionismus“ geht über die Delegitimierung Israels hinaus, es wird auch in Stellung gebracht, um Jüdinnen_Juden und nicht-jüdische Personen als politische Gegner_innen zu markieren und aus Räumen oder von Dienstleistungen auszuschließen.
Außerdem geraten zivilgesellschaftliche Initiativen zur Dokumentation antisemitischer Vorfälle zunehmend unter Druck und werden mit Vorwürfen konfrontiert, die ihre Arbeit delegitimieren sollen. In einer solchen Situation wird eine sachliche und differenzierte Auseinandersetzung erheblich erschwert – auch wenn sie gegenwärtig dringender denn je erforderlich ist.
Abstract: Expressions of antisemitic hate abound on social media today, reinvigorating ancient stereotypes around Jewish people and their history. The current user-centered study examined the shapes and the extent of antisemitic stereotypes from the point of view of emerging adults and their daily social media consumption. Emerging adults (N = 47) between 18 and 30 years of age were asked to keep guided media diaries of their social media activity over a period of 21 days (February to May 2022), zooming in on Jewish people, Jewish life, the Middle East conflict, and other topics associated with Jewry. A sample of N = 1,024 threads from a variety of social media channels was collected, encompassing textual and visual material. Qualitative content analysis was used to determine the presence of antisemitism, how explicit/implicit it was, and the types of argumentation used to support antisemitic claims. Frequency analysis and Chi-Square tests yielded beyond-chance patterns in the data. Findings reveal a high prevalence of explicit Israel-related antisemitic discourse encountered by emerging adults on social media, as well as highly ambiguous and implicit content that eludes easy detection by emerging adult users. Findings also point to the highly interactive nature in which antisemitism is co-constructed online.
Abstract: Wir untersuchen Manifestationen von Online-Antisemitismus im deutschen Sprachraum anhand von Tweets über Jüdinnen, Juden und Israel aus den Jahren 2019–2022. Die manuell annotierten Zufallsstichproben von insgesamt mehr als 8000 Tweets geben Aufschluss darüber, wie in sozialen Medien im deutschen Sprachraum vor dem 7. Oktober 2023 über jüdisches Leben und Israel gesprochen wurde.
Auch wenn nur ein kleiner Teil der Kommentare, mit 312 Nachrichten etwa vier Prozent, antisemitisch laut der IHRA-Definition von Antisemitismus waren, zeigen sie eine große Bandbreite an Formen von Antisemitismus auf. So wird sichtbar, dass viele der nach dem 7. Oktober 2023 gemachten Anschuldigungen gegen Israel auch schon vorher vorhanden waren.
Aber auch die als nicht antisemitisch gelabelten Posts bilden viele unterschiedliche Aspekte und Perspektiven ab, mit denen in Deutschland über jüdisches Leben und Antisemitismus gesprochen wird. Ein Thema war die Shoah. Dabei wurden zum Teil fragwürdige Vergleiche gezogen, etwa zwischen der Verfolgung von Jüdinnen und Juden während des Nationalsozialismus und zeitgenössischen Themen. Beispiele dafür sind die öffentliche Kritik an Personen, die sich gegen Maßnahmen zur Eindämmung der COVID-19-Pandemie stellen, das Diskriminierungsempfinden von Muslim_innen oder AfD-Sympathisant_innen sowie das Leid der Palästinenser_innen. Ein weiters Thema war Antisemitismus und die Verurteilung dessen, meist allgemein, gelegentlich aber auch konkret in Bezug auf eine bestimmte Äußerung oder Handlung. Eine zentrale Erkenntnis der Untersuchung ist, dass sich die meisten Online-Diskurse, in denen die Begriffe „Juden“ oder „Israel“ verwendet wurden, in irgendeiner Form mit Antisemitismus in Vergangenheit oder Gegenwart befassten – der Alltag von Jüdinnen, Juden und Israelis spielte dagegen eine untergeordnete Rolle.
Abstract: Today, in the age of the internet, during recent epidemics such as H1N1, Ebola and Covid-19, it is striking to see how old accusatory scripts are circulated and perpetuated via social media, which serve as new channels for discrimination and blame directed at traditional figures who have been scapegoated at different moments in the history of European epidemics. The article shows how the laundering of information into a cliquey network takes empirical shape during a health crisis. We do so by focusing on VKontakte, a Russian social network similar to Facebook and the 15th largest website in the world in terms of traffic. Using an ethnographic approach to social media, we show how borderline information from an open and easily accessible website is reappropriated, made explicit, and transformed into legally prohibited hate content. It also documents the ability of conspiracy theorists to use the full range of discourse production channels in a country-in this case France-that has very strict laws on hate speech, including that published on social networks. These laws are circumvented by anti-Semitic communities that spread false information in marginal, open and legal networks, thus avoiding legal proceedings.
Abstract: Golden Dawn (GD), Greece’s most prominent far-right political organization, strategically utilized antisemitism as its core ideological principle rather than a marginal prejudice or rhetorical device. This article argues that antisemitism served primarily as an epistemological conspiratorial framework central to GD’s ideological worldview, providing a coherent interpretive lens through which all political, economic, and social phenomena were explained as elements of a singular Jewish-orchestrated plot. Drawing on qualitative discourse analysis of over 10,300 GD publications spanning 1993 to 2020, the study illustrates how this epistemological master frame enabled the party to unify diverse domestic and international issues, from foreign policy tensions and immigration debates to economic crises, under a consistent antisemitic narrative. Additionally, by explicitly employing Holocaust denial, endorsing Nazi symbolism, and openly propagating antisemitic conspiracies, GD deliberately violated post-Holocaust European norms. This normative transgression was integral to the party’s identity, positioning it in overt defiance of mainstream moral and political boundaries. The article thus demonstrates how GD’s antisemitism functioned not merely as a rhetorical provocation but as the foundation of a comprehensive ideological system that consciously challenged established European taboos. These findings also suggest broader implications for understanding the role and adaptability of conspiratorial antisemitism and normative transgression in other extremist ideologies beyond the Greek context.
Abstract: CST recorded 3,700 antisemitic incidents in the UK in 2025, the second-highest total ever reported to CST in a single calendar year. This is an increase of 4% from the 3,556 anti-Jewish hate incidents recorded by CST in 2024, and 14% lower than the highest ever annual total of 4,298 antisemitic incidents reported in 2023. CST recorded 1,662 antisemitic incidents in 2022, and 2,261 in 2021.
The increase from the total recorded in 2024 reflects that antisemitic incident levels remain at a significantly higher rate than was the case prior to Hamas’ terror attack on Israel on 7 October 2023. There was an immediate and significant spike in recorded cases of anti-Jewish hate in the UK in the aftermath of that attack. The subsequent war, and its grip of public and media attention even during periods of ceasefire, has continued to impact the amount and nature of anti-Jewish hate reported in the 27 months since that date.
Abstract: The research examines changes in online antisemitic narratives following the Hamas terror attack on Israel on 7 October 2023 and the subsequent war. These events led to a rise in antisemitism across Europe, underscoring the need to analyze how antisemitic narratives evolved online.
Conducted simultaneously in Hungary, Italy, Poland, and Romania using a unified methodology, the study focused on online textual content, including articles, comments, and Facebook posts. It analyzed content from 1–15 April in both 2023 and 2024, reviewing nearly 7,000 pieces per country. The research methodology and categories were finalised in late 2023 and early 2024, with data collection beginning in spring 2024. The final report was completed in December 2024.
The research was based on the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism, adopted by 43 countries and several international organizations, including the EU and most of its member states.
Abstract: The research examines changes in online antisemitic narratives following the Hamas terror attack on Israel on 7 October 2023 and the subsequent war. These events led to a rise in antisemitism across Europe, underscoring the need to analyze how antisemitic narratives evolved online.
Conducted simultaneously in Hungary, Italy, Poland, and Romania using a unified methodology, the study focused on online textual content, including articles, comments, and Facebook posts. It analyzed content from 1–15 April in both 2023 and 2024, reviewing nearly 7,000 pieces per country. The research methodology and categories were finalised in late 2023 and early 2024, with data collection beginning in spring 2024. The final report was completed in December 2024.
The research was based on the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism, adopted by 43 countries and several international organizations, including the EU and most of its member states.
Abstract: The research examines changes in online antisemitic narratives following the Hamas terror attack on Israel on 7 October 2023 and the subsequent war. These events led to a rise in antisemitism across Europe, underscoring the need to analyze how antisemitic narratives evolved online.
Conducted simultaneously in Hungary, Italy, Poland, and Romania using a unified methodology, the study focused on online textual content, including articles, comments, and Facebook posts. It analyzed content from 1–15 April in both 2023 and 2024, reviewing nearly 7,000 pieces per country. The research methodology and categories were finalised in late 2023 and early 2024, with data collection beginning in spring 2024. The final report was completed in December 2024.
The research was based on the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism, adopted by 43 countries and several international organizations, including the EU and most of its member states.
Abstract: CLe 10 octobre 2013, lors d’une réunion plénière à Toronto, l’Alliance internationale pour la mémoire de l’Holocauste (IHRA) a marqué un tournant dans la compréhension des manipulations historiques en introduisant l’expression « distorsion de la Shoah ». Cette nouvelle terminologie qui étend la réflexion sur les menaces posées par l’antisémitisme et le négationnisme, dépasse le simple ajout lexical. Elle reflète une prise de conscience accrue face à la complexité des discours visant à remettre en question la réalité historique de la Shoah.
Le « négationnisme », un mot inventé en 1987 par l’historien Henry Rousso dans son ouvrage Le Syndrome de Vichy, désigne les idées de ceux qui minimisent ou nient l’extermination des Juifs durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale. À l’époque, l’historien souhaitait rectifier l’usage inapproprié du terme « révisionnisme », souvent confondu avec celui de négationnisme, et rappeler que, dans une démarche scientifique, le révisionnisme se distingue clairement de ce dernier. Il expliquait alors :
Le révisionnisme de l’histoire étant une démarche classique chez les scientifiques, on préférera ici le barbarisme, moins élégant mais plus approprié, de « négationnisme », car il s’agit bien d’un système de pensée, d’une idéologie et non d’une démarche scientifique ou même simplement critique.
Le négationnisme, en tant qu’idéologie, cherche avant tout à effacer ou déformer la réalité de la Shoah. Toutefois, cette définition s’avère insuffisante pour désigner d’autres formes de falsifications historiques qui, plutôt que de nier directement l’événement, le réinterprètent de manière à le banaliser, le déformer ou le trivialiser…
Abstract: Romania has proved to be no outlier in the ongoing trend of mainstream-ization of far-right and neo-fascist politics and discourses, despite the optimistic outlook that many shared not long ago. AUR marked a historical success, being the first “radical return” political formation to gain seats in Parliament after 1989. As a result, a process of accelerated normalization of the far-right discourse is taking place, moving the political spectrum further to the (extreme) right, while also rehabilitating historical figures that played a significant role in the Holocaust. The present paper draws on Discourse Historical Analysis and concepts such as “calculated ambivalence” and “dog-whistle politics” to unpack the coded meanings and whistles entwined in the discursive provocations and reactions of AUR’s leader, George Simion. Starting from AUR’s press release from January 2022, minimizing the Holocaust, which set in motion the “right-wing populist perpetuum mobile”, I analyze the main discursive strategies, both confrontational and submissive, used by Simion in his effort to “dog-whistle” to AUR’s ultranationalist supporters, while at the same time denying allegations of antisemitism, Holocaust minimization, and fascist sympathies. For a qualitative measure of the success or failure of these strategies, a complementary critical analysis of the reactions of some of the most prominent antisemitic ultranationalist voices in Romania is carried out. Is Simion a skillful “dog-whistler” or a “traitor”? The study shows that there is a thin and fluid line between the two.
Abstract: This study introduces an annotated dataset for the study of antisemitic hate speech and attitudes towards Jewish people in Romanian, collected from social media. We performed two types of annotation: with three simple tags
(’Neutral’, ’Positive’, ’Negative’), and with five more refined tags (Neutral’, ’Ambiguous’, ’Jewish Community’, Solidarity’, ’Zionism’, ’Antisemitism’). We perform several experiments on this dataset: clusterization, automatic classification, using classical machine learning models and transformer-based models, and sentiment analysis. The three classes clusterization produced well grouped clusters, while, as expected, the five classes clusterization produced moderately overlapping groups, except for ’Antisemitism’, which is well away from the other four groups. We obtained a good F1-Score of 0.78 in the three classes classification task with Romanian BERT model and a moderate F1-score of 0.62 for the five classes classification task with a SVM model. The lowest negative
sentiment was contained in the ’Neuter’ class, while the highest was in ’Zionism’, and not in ’Antisemitism’, as expected. Also, the same ’Zionism’ category displays the highest level of positive sentiment.
Abstract: CST recorded 1,521 antisemitic incidents across the UK in the first half of 2025, the second-highest total ever reported to CST in the first six months of any year. This is a decrease of 25% from the 2,019 antisemitic incidents recorded by CST in the January- to-June period of 2024, which was the highest figure ever reported to CST for the first half of any year. CST recorded 965 incidents in the first six months of 2023, 823 from January to June 2022, and 1,371 in the first half of 2021.
The 1,521 anti-Jewish hate incidents recorded in the first six months of 2025 is a fall from the half-year record reported in 2024, but it is a significant total, fuelled by ongoing reactions to the conflict in the Middle East. It is 11% higher than the third- highest six-monthly figure of 1,371 incidents recorded in 2021, which itself was a result of antisemitic reactions to an escalation of conflict in the Middle East across May and June that year. Antisemitic incidents have been reported to CST at an increased rate since the Hamas terror attack in Israel on 7 October 2023. After an immediate and notable spike in anti-Jewish hate immediately following that date, observed before Israel had coordinated any large- scale on-the-ground military response in Gaza, incident levels eventually settled at a substantially higher average than prior to the attack.
In the six months leading up to 7 October 2023, CST recorded a monthly average of 161 antisemitic incidents per month. In the first six months of 2025, this monthly average stood at 254 incidents, a 58% increase from that earlier period. CST had only ever recorded monthly incident totals exceeding 200 on five occasions prior to October 2023, each correlating with past periods when Israel was at war.Since the 7 October attack, the only month in which CST logged an incident figure below 200 was December 2024. The current war in the Middle East has lasted the entirety of the period covered in this report and has continued to impact the volume and discourse of antisemitism reported to CST in the first six months of this year, as it has every month since October 2023.
Abstract: W 2022 roku na zlecenie Muzeum Historii Żydów Polskich POLIN przeprowadzono trzyetapowy projekt badawczy. Jego celem było stworzenie mapy najważniejszych kodów kulturowych kształtujących obrazy Żydów we współczesnej kulturze polskiej, a także analiza związanych z nimi zagrożeń.
Raport "Kogo widzą Polacy, kiedy widzą Żyda?" podsumowuje prace badawcze. Wyniki wskazują, że antysemityzm, zwłaszcza ten nieuświadomiony, jest żywo obecny w naszej zbiorowej wyobraźni. Co więcej, jest nie tylko narzędziem dyskryminacji konkretnej grupy mniejszościowej, ale jest też powielanym schematem dyskryminacji różnych mniejszości.
Wiedzę wyniesioną z badań Muzeum POLIN wykorzystuje w programie edukacyjnym, skierowanym do decydentów i multiplikatorów: parlamentarzystów i polityków samorządowych, policji i innych służb porządku publicznego, przedstawicieli środowisk prawniczych oraz mediów i edukatorów.
Abstract: Communicative misunderstandings, cultural misinterpretations, and tribal hatreds are not phenomena that emerge and develop only in the digital world. Within platforms, conflicts explode and circulate mainly in crisis situations, but the relationship (constructive or destructive) with the similar and the different, as well as the narration of the symbolic meanings of specific cultural events, originate first and foremost in interpersonal relationships, institutional political contexts, and the representations (and consumption) of traditional media, such as the television space. Italian television is still one of the reference means of communication for the majority of the population, a figure that has been recorded especially during the recent pandemic emergency despite the significant collapse in advertising investments. Hatred, especially anti-Semitic hatred, is increasingly present in the information ecology, linked to nationalist narratives or aimed at restoring traditional values and fuelling an already highly polarised political debate in a now “dense” public sphere. In particular, during the health crisis, television journalists found it very difficult to report in depth on cases of discrimination or COVID-19.
Topics: Antisemitism: Definitions, Antisemitism: Christian, Antisemitism: Discourse and Tropes, Antisemitism: Education against, Antisemitism: Right-Wing, Antisemitism: Institutional, Antisemitism: Israel-Related, Antisemitism: Left-Wing, Antisemitism: Incident Monitoring, Antisemitism: Muslim, Antisemitism: New Antisemitism, Antisemitism: Online, Philosemitism, Main Topic: Antisemitism
Abstract: CST recorded 3,528 antisemitic incidents in the UK in 2024, the second-highest total ever reported to CST in a single calendar year. This is a decrease of 18% from the 4,296 anti-Jewish hate incidents recorded by CST in 2023, which remains the record annual total ever reported, and was fuelled by responses to the 7 October terror attack by Hamas on Israel that year. CST recorded 1,662 antisemitic incidents in 2022, 2,261 in 2021, and 1,684 in 2020.
Although the 3,528 anti-Jewish hate incidents recorded in 2024 is a fall from the all-time high of 2023, it remains an unusually large total: 56% higher than the third-highest annual figure of 2,261 incidents reported in 2021. It is a reflection of the sustained levels of antisemitism that have been recorded across the UK since the Hamas terror attack in Israel on 7 October 2023. CST’s Antisemitic Incidents Report 2023 charted the immediacy and scope of the rise in anti-Jewish hate following that attack, before Israel had set in motion any extensive military response in Gaza. The subsequent ongoing war, and the public attention that it continues to hold, impacted both the volume and content of antisemitism in 2024.
Abstract: While concern about antisemitism is growing, especially online, agreement about what exactly constitutes antisemitism is declining, especially when it appears in contexts other than those associated with Nazism.
Based on four empirical case studies and combining various qualitative analyses of digital content and semi-structured interviews, this thesis explores expressions of antisemitic hate speech and how the discursive boundaries of what can and cannot be said about Jews are perceived, dealt with, and experienced by different actors in the Norwegian digital public sphere. These include key political actors on the far right and the left, as well as members of the small and historically vulnerable Jewish minority. Theoretically, the thesis combines sociological boundary theory with perspectives from media studies, antisemitism studies and multidisciplinary research on online hate.
The thesis shows how the neo-Nazi organisation Nordic Resistance Movement and online debaters in various comment sections push boundaries by producing and promoting antisemitic content in both explicit and implicit ways. It also shows how “anti-Islamic” far-right alternative media and left-wing political organisations draw boundaries through comment moderation on their digital platforms. A key finding is that antisemitic hate speech is a diverse and complex phenomenon that can be difficult to identify. Finally, the thesis also sheds light on the experiences of antisemitic hate speech among Norwegian “public Jews”.
Beyond the empirical findings, the thesis contributes to media studies by proposing an analytical framework for how the concepts of boundaries and boundary-making can be used to understand different key dimensions and dynamics of the digital public sphere, in particular, how hateful content is communicated and countered, and the consequences for those targeted.
Topics: Antisemitism, Antisemitism: Attitude Surveys, Antisemitism: Christian, Antisemitism: Definitions, Antisemitism: Discourse and Tropes, Antisemitism: Education against, Antisemitism: Right-Wing, Antisemitism: Left-Wing, Antisemitism: Incident Monitoring, Antisemitism: Muslim, Antisemitism: New Antisemitism, Antisemitism: Online, Internet, Antisemitism: Jewish Perceptions and Experiences, Attitudes to Jews, Anti-Zionism, Israel Criticism, Main Topic: Antisemitism, Methodology, Social Media
Abstract: This open access book is the first comprehensive guide to identifying antisemitism online today, in both its explicit and implicit (or coded) forms. Developed through years of on-the-ground analysis of over 100,000 authentic comments posted by social media users in the UK, France, Germany and beyond, the book introduces and explains the central historical, conceptual and linguistic-semiotic elements of 46 antisemitic concepts, stereotypes and speech acts. The guide was assembled by researchers working on the Decoding Antisemitism project at the Centre for Research on Antisemitism at Technische Universität Berlin, building on existing basic definitions of antisemitism, and drawing on expertise in various fields. Using authentic examples taken from social media over the past four years, it sets out a pioneering step-by-step approach to identifying and categorising antisemitic content, providing guidance on how to recognise a statement as antisemitic or not. This book will be an invaluable tool through which researchers, students, practitioners and social media moderators can learn to recognise contemporary antisemitism online – and the structural aspects of hate speech more generally – in all its breadth and diversity.
Topics: Antisemitism: Attitude Surveys, Antisemitism: Incident Monitoring, Antisemitism: Online, Antisemitism: Left-Wing, Antisemitism: Muslim, Antisemitism: Discourse and Tropes, Israel Criticism, Anti-Zionism, Main Topic: Antisemitism, Policy, October 7 2023 attacks + aftermath
Abstract: In this policy paper:
How have levels of antisemitism in the UK and across Europe changed since the October 7 attack on Israel and the war in Gaza? Using the most recent survey data from July 2024, this policy paper demonstrates how the antisemitic incident reporting figures most commonly quoted significantly underestimate the number of incidents happening in reality. The paper also introduces the concept of ‘ambient antisemitism’ – Jews experiencing antisemitism that isn’t personally directed at them –looking at how the context in which Jews are living today affects their perceptions of antisemitism. It also explores the general population’s attitudes to Jews and Israel before and after October 7, 2023.
The paper concludes that better research methods are required to accurately assess the general population’s attitudes to Jews and Israel and Jewish people’s perceptions and experiences of antisemitism. It points to a critical gap in research compared with the EU and calls on the UK Government and philanthropic community to plug it as a matter of urgency.
Some of the key findings in this policy paper:
Reports of antisemitic incidents increased dramatically in the months following the Hamas attacks on Israel on October 7 in multiple European countries.
Survey data demonstrate that the number of antisemitic incidents being recorded by the police and community monitoring agencies vastly underestimates the amount of antisemitism taking place.
An evident rise in antisemitism since October 7 has had a significant impact on Jewish people’s feelings of safety and security in the UK and across Europe.
The degree to which the Hamas attacks on October 7 were marked by open celebration and affirmation of violence reveals a level of antisemitic hate that exists within parts of Western Europe that poses a severe threat to Jews living on the continent.
A culture of ‘ambient antisemitism’ has emerged in the post-October 7 period, marked by incidents such as defacing or tearing down posters of Israeli hostages, that, whether strictly antisemitic or not, create a broader milieu that feels threatening and hostile to many Jewish people.
Inaccurate and irresponsible media reporting can lead directly to an increase in antisemitism, although more research is required to understand how and when this occurs.
There has been a significant increase in sympathy for the Palestinians among young people and those on the political left since October 7; levels of sympathy for Israel are much lower, even in the very immediate aftermath of the Hamas attacks.
The lack of sympathy for Israel is likely to lead to many Jews feeling a greater sense of alienation from the societies in which they live over time.
Given the apparent levels of concern among Jews today, much more needs to be done to invest in a robust and systematic approach to measuring antisemitism in society and its effects on Jews as part of a serious strategy to combat it going forward. This is particularly the case in the UK, which has fallen far behind the EU since leaving the European Union in this respect.
Abstract: CST recorded 1,978 antisemitic incidents across the UK in the first half of 2024, the highest total ever reported to CST in the first six months of any year. This is an increase of 105% from the 964 antisemitic incidents recorded by CST in the January-to-June period of 2023, which was the third-highest half year figure reported to CST. CST recorded 823 incidents in the first six months of 2022, 1,371 from January to June 2021, and 875 in the first half of 2020.
The 1,978 antisemitic incidents recorded in the first six months of 2024 is 44% higher than the previous half-year record of 1,371 incidents in 2021, and is a reflection of the ongoing high volume of anti-Jewish hate reported since the Hamas terror attack in Israel on 7 October 2023. As documented in CST’s Antisemitic Incidents Report 2023, there was an instant increase in antisemitic incident levels in the UK following Hamas’ attack on Israel, before Israel had coordinated any large scale military response in Gaza. The subsequent war, and the widespread public focus it has drawn, have continued to impact the scale and content of antisemitism so far this year.
Abstract: According to the Jewish Chronicle, on December 1, 2021, a group of Jewish bus passengers on their way to celebrate Chanukkah in London were attacked by a mob, spit upon, verbally abused, and subjected to Nazi salutes.1 Similarly, the monitoring group Tell MAMA reported that in the week after the Daily Telegraph published a column written by the then prime minister Boris Johnson, in which he compared Muslim women to “letterboxes” and “bank robbers,” Islamophobic incidents in the United Kingdom rose by 375 percent. In December 2019, a fourteen- year- old Muslim girl was violently attacked on her way home from school. The same month, a rabbi waiting in the Stamford Hill overground station was beaten by two men who shouted, “fucking Jew, dirty Jew” and “kill the Jews”; a month earlier a Jewish father and his two young sons were the targets of antisemitic abuse on the London Underground. While these forms of generalized Islamophobia and antisemitism have unfortunately become commonplace in the United Kingdom , there exists a largely unexamined form of antisemitic/Islamophobic violence perpetuated against LGBT Muslims and Jews— double minorities. In this chapter, I examine discourses present in the British print media that may contribute to a framing of LGBT Muslims and Jews in ways that can lead to the demonization of members of both communities. Robert Phillips My focus here is in the collective representation of double minorities by the British press. In choosing this focus, I should point out that those minorities who are the targets of harassment are targeted largely due to the saliency of their difference. As noted above, women wearing head or body coverings of any degree and men and boys wearing what are perceived to be “Muslim” or “Jewish” clothing or hairstyle (head coverings/payot) are often targeted. This includes Sikh men and boys wearing turbans, in that some may incorrectly identify them as Muslims. Because of outward appearance, many of the victims of these crimes may also be perceived to be observant in their faith and perhaps even threatening to national security and identity. This chapter is concerned with members of these communities who also identify as LGBT, positioning them as double minorities. As with members of other diasporic communities around the globe, LGBT Muslims and Jews have assumed unique types of identity forged through a combination of factors brought about by, among other things, processes of transnational migration. As both Muslims and Jews form some of the smallest ethnic communities in Britain, they are far outnumbered by more dominant Anglo groups and share a type of liminal subjectivity. Gay Muslim and Jewish men are both an ethnic and a sexual minority, further complicating this relationship. This dual-minority status has had a distinctive effect on how nonminority British view these individuals. For instance, Yip focuses on kin relations when examining the narratives of non-heterosexual British Muslims and suggests that within these communities , there is a perception of homosexuality as a “Western” disease that did not exist in the family’s community of origin. They also point out the fraught negotiations between parents and children, complicated further by sociocultural and religious factors, when it comes time to marry and the subsequent strategies employed by the children. In terms of how the nation views Muslims in Britain, Jaspal and Cinnirella position such subjects as a hybridized threat— British Muslims are positioned solidly as “other” while simultaneously being framed as a threat to the survival of the “in- group.”
Abstract: In 2017 a conflict erupted among the Bosniaks in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was related to identity and self-image, in particular the role of Bosnian Muslims during World War II. Highly sensitive but seldom discussed issues were brought to the fore. Had not Muslim forces massacred Serb villages? Did not Croat and Muslim Ustasha kill most of the Jews in Bosnia? Why, then, regard antisemitic collaborators as national role models?
Reactions varied from condemnation to arguments that Muslims acted in self-defence. Even antisemitic rhetoric appeared. There was a divide between a liberal, secular opinion and religious-national views within the ruling party or the Islamic Community. Apparently, a certain continuity existed between Muslim elites during World War II and those in power since 1990. In the 1930s, Bosnian Muslims were familiar with currents in the Middle East, the ideas of the Muslim Brotherhood and the anti-Jewish message of the Mufti of Jerusalem. The organization Young Muslims, inspired by Islamist ideas from Egypt, was violently supressed by the Communists 1945–48, but reappeared in 1990, forming the nucleus of the Party of Democratic Action, led by Alija Izetbegović. After the war, high-level contacts with the Muslim Brothers were cordial and regular.
The crisis revealed tensions between the religious foundation of Bosniak identity and the building of a modern nation. Parts of society had been nurturing a discourse of martyrdom where history had to be ignored or revised.
Abstract: Social media platforms and the interactive web have had a significant impact on political socialisation, creating new pathways of community-building that shifted the focus from real-life, localised networks (such as unions or neighbourhood associations) to vast, diffuse and globalised communities (Finin et al. 2008, Rainie and Wellman 2012, Olson 2014, Miller 2017). Celebrities or influencers are often focal nodes for the spread of information and opinions across these new types of networks in the digital space (see Hutchins and Tindall 2021). Unfortunately, this means that celebrities’ endorsement of extremist discourse or narratives can potently drive the dissemination and normalisation of hate ideologies.
This paper sets out to analyse the reaction of French social media audiences to antisemitism controversies involving pop culture celebrities. I will focus on two such episodes, one with a ‘national’ celebrity at its centre and the other a ‘global’ celebrity: the social media ban of the French-Cameroonian comedian Dieudonné M’bala M’bala in June–July 2020 and the controversy following US rapper Kanye West’s spate of antisemitic statements in October–November 2022. The empirical corpus comprises over 4,000 user comments on Facebook, YouTube and Twitter (now X). My methodological approach is two-pronged: a preliminary mapping of the text through content analysis is followed by a qualitative Critical Discourse Analysis that examines linguistic strategies and discursive constructions employed by social media users to legitimise antisemitic worldviews. We lay particular emphasis on the manner in which memes, dog-whistling or coded language (such as allusions or inside jokes popular within certain communities or fandoms) are used not only to convey antisemitic meaning covertly but also to build a specific form of counter-cultural solidarity. This solidarity expresses itself in the form of “ deviant communities” (see Proust et al. 2020) based on the performative and deliberate transgression of societal taboos and norms.
