Abstract: Expressions of antisemitic hate abound on social media today, reinvigorating ancient stereotypes around Jewish people and their history. The current user-centered study examined the shapes and the extent of antisemitic stereotypes from the point of view of emerging adults and their daily social media consumption. Emerging adults (N = 47) between 18 and 30 years of age were asked to keep guided media diaries of their social media activity over a period of 21 days (February to May 2022), zooming in on Jewish people, Jewish life, the Middle East conflict, and other topics associated with Jewry. A sample of N = 1,024 threads from a variety of social media channels was collected, encompassing textual and visual material. Qualitative content analysis was used to determine the presence of antisemitism, how explicit/implicit it was, and the types of argumentation used to support antisemitic claims. Frequency analysis and Chi-Square tests yielded beyond-chance patterns in the data. Findings reveal a high prevalence of explicit Israel-related antisemitic discourse encountered by emerging adults on social media, as well as highly ambiguous and implicit content that eludes easy detection by emerging adult users. Findings also point to the highly interactive nature in which antisemitism is co-constructed online.
Abstract: Public concern about antisemitism has increased globally in the twenty-first century, sparking renewed interest from social scientists. However, the crucial question of why trajectories of antisemitic hostility differ between countries remains unanswered due to a lack of studies designed to track temporal and cross-national variation. Addressing this gap, I evaluate the explanatory power of two main lines of argument that divide the literature: generalist and particularist. While generalists see antisemitism as a manifestation of general outgroup hostility common to various forms of prejudice, particularists stress the contextual specificity of antisemitism and posit that its twenty-first-century expressions are distinctively linked to anti-Zionist sentiment (enmity toward Israel and its supporters). I derive observable implications from these positions and conduct a comparative, longitudinal case study of antisemitic hostility in Germany, Sweden, and Russia (1990–2020), using a mixed-methods approach to integrate incident counts, victimization surveys, media analysis, and expert interviews. Findings match predictions from the particularist position, with flare-ups in the Israel–Palestine conflict generating or catalyzing antisemitic hostility depending on the strength of local anti-Zionist sentiment, thus demonstrating the centrality of the “Israel factor” in contemporary antisemitism.
Abstract: The events of October 7, 2023, and their aftermath have intensified social and political tensions across Europe, profoundly impacting both Jewish and Muslim communities. This article explores the phenomenon of dual silencing, where members of these communities face exclusion, misrepresentation, and suppression in public discourse. Jewish voices, often conflated with Israeli state politics, encounter rising antisemitism, while Muslim perspectives are increasingly marginalized amid heightened Islamophobic/anti-Muslim rhetoric. Through an analysis of personal accounts, public testimonies, media narratives, political responses, and societal attitudes, this study examines how both communities experience symbolical erasure and selective amplification depending on shifting political agendas. Using the Czech context as a case study, this article argues that the post-October 7 discourse has deepened existing societal fault lines and significantly influenced how Jewish and Muslim identities are negotiated in the public sphere. The study concludes by considering the implications of this dual silencing for intercommunal relations, and the future of pluralism in Europe.
Abstract: Since 7th October 2023, when Hamas perpetrated the worst single massacre against Jews since the Holocaust, there has been a surge in antisemitism in UK universities. Some of this has tipped over into outright anti-Jewish discrimination and harassment. Jewish students and staff have reported feeling unable to fully participate in university life, for fear of being abused, harassed, or attacked. This report offers a summary of research by the IntraCommunal Professorial Group (ICPG) aimed at understanding free speech on university campuses especially with regard to the approaches to speech concerning Jews, Israel, Zionism, and the Middle East conflict.
This report sets out the key issues, and a series of recommendations based on the research and grouped together under the subheadings of our three key findings. Those key findings are as follows:
1. UK universities have (a) a general legal duty, to protect freedom of expression on campus; (b) a duty to prevent discrimination and harassment based on protected characteristics; (c) a university-specific institutional duty to protect the academic freedoms of research and study. Currently UK universities are meeting neither (b) nor (c) in their response to the menace to Jewish students and academic staff posed by antisemitism, particularly antiIsrael antisemitism. That is, they are neither preventing discrimination and harassment, nor protecting freedom of research or freedom to study.
2. Anti-Israel protests and encampments on campuses, including in online spaces, have exacerbated what was already considered a hostile environment by many Jewish students and staff. Some university departments, trade unions, and student political milieus – inperson and online – have directly and indirectly discriminated against, abused, harassed and/or excluded Jewish students.
3. Traditional antisemitic concepts and tropes are being used by pro-Palestinian and/or antiIsrael staff and students. Israel and Zionism are regularly demonised and delegitimised, often using blood libels or other anti-Jewish hatred, and students or academics labelled as Zionists are routinely viewed as legitimate targets for discrimination, harassment, abuse, and/or attack.
Abstract: This report finds that the decision to ban away supporters from the fixture was reached through a flawed risk assessment process.
We argue that the prohibition was not justified by the risks as assessed, and it represented an unnecessary departure from ordinary policing practice, which we believe would likely have been sufficient to secure the match.
The Parliamentary Select Committee similarly concludes that the decision-making process was flawed. However, it maintains that the prohibition was proportionate to the level of risk, even if that risk had been more rigorously assessed.
Our analysis considers a further, key point. A central weakness in the decision-making process was the failure clearly to specify the nature and source of the risk.
If the primary risk came from away supporters themselves, then exclusion may have been justified. But if the principal risk derived from anti-Israel protestors, boycott activists, and antizionist actors seeking to disrupt or attack the match, then banning the away supporters risked punishing those who were being threatened and who did not themselves constitute a significant threat.
In such circumstances, the appropriate response would have required consideration beyond technical policing calculations. If there was a significant antisemitic threat, a policy priority might have been to mobilise sufficient police resources to defend the match, the visiting team, and their supporters rather than excluding them.
The decision-making process appears to have overestimated the risk posed by Maccabi Tel Aviv supporters, in part through a misreading of the Amsterdam precedent and perhaps through reliance on politically committed sources of advice. It may have given insufficient weight to risks arising from boycott activism and to the risk of antisemitic violence of the kind that occurred in Amsterdam.
The process did not engage in a serious way with institutions or individuals from the Jewish community either locally or nationally, or with HM Independent Advisor on Antisemitism. Doing so would have given it a better chance of avoiding the mistakes that it made in understanding the precedent, possible alternatives and the predictable impact of the away fans ban on Jewish communities.
If there was a significant antisemitic dimension to the threat environment, the risk assessment process did not identify or articulate it clearly.
Abstract: For this report, the Union of Jewish Students has collated dozens of testimonies from students who have
experienced antisemitism on campus.
The UJS also commissioned polling of 1,000 students, across all faiths and none, to assess the
impact of campus protests and the rise of antisemitism. The findings reveal alarming levels of campus
antisemitism, significant disruption caused by protests, and perceptions of Jewish students marred by
hostility and intolerance.
Key Findings:
1.Antisemitism has become normalised on our campuses.
- One in four students (23%) have seen behaviour that targets Jewish students for their religion/ethnicity.
- One in five (20%) students would be reluctant to, or would never, houseshare with a Jewish student.
- Jewish students have told us they have faced physical and verbal abuse, social ostracisation and
widespread antisemitic attitudes.
2.Glorification of terrorism is prevalent and unpunished.
- Our research has found that student groups have explicitly called for violence against Jews, even justifying the terrorist attack at Bondi Beach in December 2025.
- 49% of students have heard slogans or chants glorifying Hamas, Hezbollah or other proscribed groups on campus.
- 47% have witnessed justification of the October 7th attacks, rising to 77% among those who encounter Israel-Palestine protests regularly.
3. Protests disrupt all students, and universities have a clear mandate from students to take firmer action.
-Protests have disrupted learning for 65% of students, and 40% have altered their journey on campus to avoid disruption.
- Universities where protests are more frequent have seen higher levels of antisemitism, and four in ten (39%) of students who witness regular Israel-Palestine protests have seen Jewish students harassed often.
- 69% of students disapprove of protests blocking access to learning, and 82% deem calls to 'globalise the intifada' to be antisemitic.
Abstract: The study examines antisemitism and anti-Israel attitudes in Sweden, analyzing their links to prejudicial attitudes, conspiracy beliefs, and institutional trust. Based on a representative survey of 3,507 individuals, the findings reveal that antisemitism and anti-Israel attitudes are related, but differ in important ways. Antisemitism is associated with anti-immigrant and sexist attitudes and greater endorsement of conspiracy beliefs, but is unrelated to institutional trust. By contrast, anti-Israel attitudes are unrelated to anti-immigrant attitudes and are positively associated with governemnt trust and media confidence. Cluster analyses have identified three profiles: Neutral Moderates (low antisemitism and low anti-Israel attitudes), Critical Engagers (low antisemitism but moderate anti-Israel attitudes), and Distrustful Sceptics (heightened levels of both). These profiles differ in socio-demographic characteristics, prejudicial attitudes, and conspiracy beliefs, with higher institutional trust increasing the likelihood of belonging to Critical Engagers. The findings suggest that institutional trust may channel individuals toward stronger anti-Israel attitudes, particularly in Sweden.
Abstract: Depuis les années 2000, et plus encore depuis le 7 octobre 2023, les actes antisémites se sont multipliés dans de nombreux pays, dont la Belgique.
Quel est l’état des lieux dans notre pays ? Quelle part de la population belge nourrit des préjugés antisémites ? La haine antisémite serait-elle de retour en Belgique ?
En s’appuyant sur les résultats détaillés du seul sondage d’envergure mené en Belgique sur ces sujets, Joël Kotek et Joël Amar se sont attachés, dans ce rapport, à répondre à ces questions. Dans une société belge en voie d’archipellisation, leur rapport montre la persistance d’opinions antisémites, ainsi que leur sur-représentation à l’extrême-droite, à l’extrême-gauche, chez les musulmans et à Bruxelles.
Il met en lumière quatre formes d’antisémitisme qui prennent en étau les Belges juifs, nourrissant chez eux un vif sentiment de solitude et d’inquiétude. En publiant ce rapport sur un sujet peu étudié et souvent frappé de déni, l’Institut Jonathas veut objectiver les différentes réalités de l’antisémitisme en Belgique et alerter sur les menaces qui pèsent sur les Juifs et, au-delà, sur la société belge dans son ensemble.
Il entend également contribuer à un sursaut, ayant la conviction que la lutte contre l’antisémitisme a besoin d’un « reset » en Belgique, c’est-à-dire d’une réinitialisation en vue d’une plus grande efficacité.
Abstract: Cet article a pour objet les réactions des universités belges concernant leurs relations académiques avec Israël et la façon dont elles ont géré les protestations étudiantes pour la Palestine et Gaza depuis le 7 octobre 2023. A partir d’une enquête minutieuse conduite sur les campus des principales universités belges (Université Libre de Bruxelles, Université de Liège, Université Catholique de Louvain, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, UGhent, Université d’Anvers), cet article élabore une analyse chronologique des dégâts, des événements polémiques et des revendications étudiantes. En outre, il souligne la façon dont les recteurs et équipes pédagogiques des universités se sont positionnés vis-à-vis d’Israël, pays avec lequel celles-ci n’avaient, somme toute, que fort peu de partenariat direct. Tout cela dans un climat général d’hostilité à Israël.
Abstract: La séquence génocidaire déclenchée le 7 octobre 2023 par le Hamas n’a pas seulement engendré une catastrophe humanitaire de grande ampleur, elle a également servi de détonateur à une libération de la parole antisémite dans des proportions et sous des formes que l’on croyait reléguées aux marges les plus extrêmes de l’espace public occidental. Bien au-delà des slogans violents ou des propos haineux épisodiques, ce sont des tropes antisémites pluriséculaires – que l’on pensait à jamais disqualifiés par leur association historique avec la Shoah – qui opèrent aujourd’hui un retour tonitruant dans le débat public, et ce jusqu’au sein des médias les plus respectés. Au centre de ces motifs éculés, celui du Juif tueur d’enfants, buveur de sang et figure surnaturelle du mal refait surface. Le Juif
(certes déguisé en sioniste), n’apparaît plus comme citoyen, soldat ou acteur politique, mais comme incarnation du mal absolu. L’imagerie du vampire, du sacrificateur, du boucher – jusque-là instruments de la propagande nazie, des
pamphlets d’extrême droite, de la rhétorique de l’ultra-gauche radicale et des médias arabo-musulmans les plus haineux – refleurit aujourd’hui… dans la presse grand public européenne.
Abstract: Israel-related forms of antisemitism belong to the most widely distributed patterns of this hatred. Despite the broad covering of the Middle East conflict in the German public discourse, this subject is not prominently represented in the education system (teacher training, school books, etc.). To address teachers’ insecurities and make specific didactical offers, a range of pedagogical handouts has been published since the 2000s. However, the didactical characteristics and appropriateness of these materials have not been analyzed on a broader scale. This paper offers a rare documental focus, as it presents the results of work with a research corpus that includes 195 scenarios of civic education on the topics of the Middle East conflict and Israel-related antisemitism, for which the approach of Qualitative Content Analysis has been used. Based on this research, a typology of didactical approaches has been developed, taking into account didactical and content-related dimensions. This typology can be used to precisely identify and address currently existing lacunae in antisemitism-related education. In addition, this paper discusses the specific contributions of educational materials of each type to antisemitism prevention as well as their non-intended effects.
Abstract: This article examines the impact of the 2023–2025 Israeli–Palestinian conflict—particularly the aftermath of the October 7 Hamas attack, subsequent war in Gaza, and the international public opinion reactions to those events—on Jewish community in Krakow, Poland. While pro-Palestinian protests in Poland were limited compared to those in Western countries, they marked an unprecedented local development, sparking debate within Jewish circles. Using Krakow as a case study, the article explores whether and how these events shifted discourse around Zionism, Israel, and Jewish identity. It employs discourse analysis, supplemented by comparative methodology, the study relies on the data from the semi-structured interviews, and analyses of the official statements and media report as well as the social media discourses. The article addresses two questions: (1) how and why did the Jewish community in Krakow respond to the escalation of the Middle East conflict and the subsequent events, particularly pro-Palestinian activism? (2) do the observed dynamics reflect global trends or local particularities?
Abstract: Publiek Private samenwerking onvoldoende.
BLEW brengt nu voor de derde maal haar dreigingsrapport uit. Sinds ons eerste rapport, in 2014, is het denken rondom beveiliging drastisch veranderd. De conclusie van het eerste rapport was dat er op korte termijn meer beveiliging nodig was. Momenteel is de vraag niet of maar hoe we als Joodse gemeenschap, en in toenemende mate als maatschappij, ons kunnen beschermen tegen terrorisme.
Het antwoord op die vraag hangt af van de aard en mate van dreiging waarbij de ‘modus operandi’ (wijze van aanslag plegen) steeds wisselt. Deze blijft onverminderd hoog, maar de aard van de dreiging verandert: de weerbaarheid is weliswaar toegenomen maar de risico’s zijn groter geworden. De hogere alertheid en grotere weerbaarheid van met name de overheid vergroot de veiligheid, maar met een veel gevaarlijker en fatalere modus operandi waarbij het maken van veel slachtoffers in openbare en moeilijke te beveiligen doelen
prioritiet heeft is de dreiging niet als minder te kwalificeren.
De Joodse gemeenschap blijft een primair doelwit van jihadistisch terreur. De haat tegen het Westen, Israël en Joden in het bijzonder blijft ideologisch met elkaar verbonden. Het huidige dadersperspectief is onveranderd. De targets lijken echter, ook op ideologische gronden, te verschuiven naar meer algemeen Westerse ‘soft targets’ waarbij aanslagen worden gepleegd in onschuldige niets vermoedende menigtes: zelfmoordaanslagen, steekpartijen, doelbewuste aanrijdingen en schietpartijen met zware wapens.
De overheid ziet zich in snel tempo geconfronteerd met grote uitdagingen zoals aanslagen in openbare ruimtes, toenemende invloed van salafisme, radicalisering, terugkerende Nederlandse jihadisten, falend integratiebeleid, de vluchtelingenstroom en open grenzen.
De overheid intensiveert haar inzet door het uitbreiden van de Nationale Terrorisme Lijst, het mede-oprichten van een Europees Centrum voor Terrorisme Bestrijding, het ontmoedigen van het uitreizen naar Syrië onder radicale moslims, het beter controleren van vluchtelingen die Nederland binnenkomen en het opleiden van speciale eenheden van de Koninklijke Marechaussee.
De Stichting Bij Leven en Welzijn zet zich al 45 jaar in voor een veilige samenleving. BLEW heeft ervaring en expertise voor de beveiliging van een klein en kwetsbaar deel van onze samenleving; daarbij hebben wij een visie op de bescherming van de samenleving in bredere zin. Het gezamenlijke belang wordt steeds duidelijker zichtbaar. De enige manier om optimaal effectief te beveiligen is door samenwerking. Wij zien grote kansen voor de betere benutting van Publiek Private Samenwerkings verbanden (PPS) en hopen dat dit rapport een uitnodiging
zal zijn om deze verder te exploreren.
Abstract: De situatie is kritiek en het enige antwoord op korte termijn is beveiliging.
Hierbij presenteert Bij Leven En Welzijn (BLEW) haar eerste dreigingsrapport over de situatie van de Joodse gemeenschap in Nederland. Dit rapport heeft tot doel om het dreigingsbeeld voor de Joodse gemeenschap in Nederland in beeld te brengen.#
Naast een schets van de belangrijkste factoren die dit dreigingsbeeld bepalen introduceren wij de BLEW-index, waarmee objectief kan worden gemeten wat het dreigingsniveau op een bepaald moment is. Wij doen dit via de formule ‘Dreiging = Waarschijnlijkheid + Risico’.
Het rapport gaat in op de situatie van de afgelopen twee jaar. De reden hiervoor is dat de veiligheidssituatie sinds 2012, door het toenemen van het aantal (en het terugkeren van) uit Europa afkomstige jihadstrijders, significant is verslechterd. Dit jihadisme richt zich na terugkomst in Europa veelal tegen Westerse en specifiek Amerikaanse en Israëlische doelen. Omdat Amerikaanse en Israëlische doelen (zoals consulaten, ambassades en informatiecentra) in Europa zeer goed beveiligd zijn, worden Joodse soft-targets als synagogen, scholen en musea – voor velen synoniem aan Israëlisch – vanuit een daderperspectief interessantere en haalbare doelen.
Deze situatie wordt bovendien gevaarlijker omdat de duizenden naar Europa terugkerende Syriëgangers goed zijn getraind, zich niet gebonden voelen door landsgrenzen en onmogelijk permanent door de inlichtingendiensten kunnen worden gemonitord.
Deze en andere factoren zijn meegenomen in de BLEW-monitor, waarbij onze conclusie is dat het dreigingsniveau als ‘kritisch’ moet worden bestempeld en dat het belang van beveiliging voor de Joodse gemeenschap groter is dan ooit.
Reeds in 2012 heeft BLEW bij de relevante overheidsinstanties aangegeven dat de veiligheidssituatie voor de Joodse gemeenschap in Nederland kritisch begon te worden. Dit werd destijds niet gedeeld door de relevante overheidsinstanties. Na de aanslagen op Joodse instellingen in landen om ons heen (in 2012 in Toulouse en recentelijk Brussel) en het steeds grotere aantal uit vooral Syrië teruggekeerde jihadisten heeft de AIVD eind juni van dit jaar het rapport 'Transformatie van het jihadisme in Nederland' gepubliceerd. Onze conclusies sluiten hier bij aan. De Nederlandse jihadbeweging is omvangrijker dan ooit en vormt een toenemende bedreiging voor de nationale
veiligheid in het algemeen en de Joodse gemeenschap in het bijzonder.
Wij zijn dan ook van mening dat we met dit rapport zowel een belangrijke bijdrage zullen leveren aan het bewustzijn omtrent de veiligheidssituatie als aan die van de Joodse gemeenschap in Nederland.
Op het moment van publicatie is de Israëlische militaire operatie Protective Edge bezig in de Gazastrook. Deze operatie is begonnen om de onophoudelijke raketbeschietingen vanuit Gaza op Israël door Hamas en pogingen tot infiltratie van Israël door terroristen via tunnels te stoppen. Een concrete analyse van deze situatie is niet verwerkt in dit rapport, maar de (inter)nationale ontwikkelingen tonen nu reeds een duidelijk verband tussen militaire spanningen in het MiddenOosten en anti-Israël sentiment dat zich manifesteert in antisemitisme, ook in Nederland.
Abstract: Der wissenschaftliche Kommentar diskutiert die Verbreitung antisemitischer Einstellungen in der Mitte der deutschen wie auch österreichischen Gesellschaft und leitet aufgrund differenter Studienergebnisse Anforderungen an schulische Antisemitismus-Prävention ab. Die erste zentrale Fragestellung untersucht, ob antisemitische Einstellungen als Randphänomen zu betrachten oder in der Meinung der gesellschaftlichen Mitte zu verorten sind. Anhand von Statistiken und Studien zu antisemitischen Straftaten und Einstellungen wird aufgezeigt, dass der Antisemitismus in Deutschland und Österreich kein Randphänomen darstellt, sondern in Teilen der gesellschaftlichen Mitte verankert ist. Darauf aufbauend ist Untersuchungsgegenstand der zweiten zentralen Fragestellung, ab welcher Klassenstufe schulische Präventionsmaßnahmen gegen Antisemitismus berechtigt sind. Das Potenzial der schulischen Präventionsarbeit als Interventionsmöglichkeit wird dabei analysiert, die Bedeutung der Medienkompetenzförderung im Präventionsansatz erläutert und es werden frühzeitige Präventionsansätze, beginnend ab der ersten Klasse, empfohlen, um antisemitischen Überzeugungen frühestmöglich entgegenzuwirken. Im Fazit werden konkrete Forderungen sowie Handlungsempfehlungen an Schulen, die Gesellschaft und die Politik formuliert, um Antisemitismus durch Präventionsmaßnahmen nachhaltig zu bekämpfen.
Abstract: In den Antworten zu den Faith Development Interviews (FDI), die seit 2003 von der Forschungsstelle zur Biographischen Religionsforschung der Universität Bielefeld durchgeführt werden, finden sich bei den beiden Fragen, die auffordern, das Böse in der Welt zu erklären und nach der Lösung für Konflikte zu suchen, die auf religiöser oder weltanschaulicher Uneinigkeit beruhen, häufig Rekurse auf den Nahostkonflikt. Beiden Fragen ist gemeinsam, dass sie darauf abzielen, anomische Phänomene, in denen die Ordnung des eigenen Lebens nicht mehr sinnvoll erfahren werden kann, zu erklären. Die Forschungsnotiz analysiert, welche Funktion der Bezug auf den Nahostkonflikt für die Welterklärung der Befragten hat und was mit diesen Bezügen plausibel gemacht werden kann: Erstens ermöglicht der Nahostkonflikt als Beispiel für einen unlösbaren Konflikt eine Vielzahl von Projektionen und schützt damit die Widerlegung des eigenen weltanschaulichen Problemlösungsideals. Zweitens unterstreicht die Identifikation der Konfliktpartei Israel mit dem Bösen die Funktion des israelbezogenen Antisemitismus als Welterklärung.
Abstract: This report from B’nai B’rith International, democ and the European Union of Jewish Students (EUJS) documents the surge of antisemitism on university campuses across Europe in the aftermath of the October 7, 2023 Hamas terrorist attack in Israel. Since then, Jewish students and faculty have faced harassment, intimidation and violence, creating a climate of fear and exclusion across campuses.
Universities that should safeguard open debate and diversity have instead seen antisemitic rhetoric, Holocaust distortion, glorification of Hamas and calls for “intifada.” Professors, radical student groups, and outside organizations have often fueled this atmosphere, while administrators too often failed to act.
Covering Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom, the report identifies repeated patterns: threats and assaults against Jewish students, antisemitic vandalism, incitement to violence, and weak or inconsistent institutional responses.
Abstract: This autoethnographic study explores manifestations of antisemitism on a European university campus, focusing on personal experiences as an Israeli Jewish student at the University of Coimbra. Drawing from firsthand observations, documented incidents, and interactions with protesters, administrative officials, and peers, the research highlights how hate-laden stickers, verbal threats, and institutional inaction shape a hostile academic climate. By weaving together personal narrative and scholarly frameworks on hate speech, higher education policies, and antisemitism, the study reveals a troubling dissonance between the university’s stated commitment to inclusivity and its inadequate responses to overt acts of discrimination. Through detailed descriptions of unfolding events—from the initial appearance of incendiary slogans to meetings with administrators—the analysis illuminates how deeply entrenched biases can circumvent legal and procedural safeguards. In reflecting on emotional responses and the complexities of positionality, the autoethnographic lens underscores the human impact of hostile environments and the gaps in institutional support. The findings urge higher education stakeholders to reevaluate their protocols for handling hate speech and discrimination, calling for comprehensive measures that protect vulnerable groups and encourage critical engagement with contentious geopolitical issues. This work ultimately argues that acknowledging and actively combating antisemitism in academic settings is crucial for fostering genuine inclusivity and upholding the values of open, respectful scholarship.
Abstract: Face à la multiplication des actes antisémites depuis quelques années et leur déferlement après le 7 octobre, l'inquiétude des Français juifs grandit : ont-ils encore un avenir dans leur pays ?
7 octobre 2023. Israël est frappé par l'attaque terroriste la plus meurtrière de son histoire. Quelques semaines plus tard, la France bascule : + 1 000 % d'actes antisémites.
Pendant plus d'un an, Dov Maïmon et Didier Long ont mené une enquête inédite, sillonnant la France, questionnant ministres, policiers, juges antiterroristes, politologues, citoyens et hommes de foi de toutes confessions. Entre autres.
Ils ont aussi eu accès à des données jamais révélées à ce jour, issues de rapports confidentiels des services secrets français et israéliens.
En s'appuyant sur ces sources, les auteurs analysent les menaces qui pèsent sur les Français juifs aujourd'hui.
Dans un contexte social délétère, la montée de l'islamisme laisse présager un basculement vers un régime autoritaire ou une guerre civile.
Une question se pose alors : les Juifs de France doivent-ils partir avant qu'il ne soit trop tard ?
Abstract: Las siguientes reflexiones afrontan, en clave victimológica, el conflicto palestino-israelí, y más concretamente la actual Guerra de Gaza. El desencadenante de la operación militar israelí contra la población palestina fueron los salvajes atentados cometidos en Israel por la organización terrorista Hamás el 7 de octubre de 2023, con imágenes dantescas que dieron la vuelta al mundo. Sin embargo, en el concreto caso de España, dicho ataque y su rotunda condena fueron silenciados por las instituciones universitarias, no mostrando empatía alguna con la población israelí y judía. Todo lo contrario, sucedió con la operación militar en Gaza por parte del ejército hebreo, la cual dio lugar no solo a concentraciones de protesta en favor del pueblo palestino, sino también a todo tipo de proclamas, amenazas e insultos contra Israel. La actual situación ha conducido a que la población judía residente en Occidente se haya vuelto prácticamente invisible, habiéndose reducido al mínimo la vida judía en Europa por miedo a ataques y atentados contra un colectivo, sin tener en cuenta que un importante sector del mismo condena sin paliativos la Guerra de Gaza y sus repercusiones sobre la población palestina.
Abstract: Projekt Overview
This study explores the experiences, perceptions, and coping strategies of Jewish individuals in Germany in the aftermath of the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel. Our research aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of how Jews in Germany, with or without Israeli migration background, navigated the complex emotional landscape of collective trauma and rising antisemitism.
Key Objectives
Examine the immediate and ongoing impacts of the October 7 events on Jewish individuals in Germany
Investigate changes in experiences of antisemitism and perceptions of societal responses
Identify coping strategies and resilience mechanisms employed by Jewish individuals
Explore the influence of these events on Jewish identity and community engagement
Assess concerns and hopes for the future of Jewish life in Germany
Methodology
We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 18 Jewish individuals living in Germany, including both Israeli and non-Israeli backgrounds. Participants ranged in age from 23 to 68 years old and represented diverse socioeconomic backgrounds and levels of religious observance.
Key Findings
Profound emotional disruption and trauma following the October 7 attacks
Significant changes in social relationships, often leading to social withdrawal
Increased community engagement and activism among Jewish individuals
Heightened sense of insecurity and vigilance in expressing Jewish identity
Complex coping strategies, including humor, community involvement, and selective avoidance
