How Best to Define Antisemitism? A Structural Approach
Author(s)
Publication Name
Publication Date
Abstract
In the current discussion about definitions of antisemitism, the empirical social sciences have been marginalized. Groups of well-intentioned experts make decisions without considering the real-life experiences and perceptions of Jewish people—those who are impacted by antisemitism. I advocate returning the decision to the people, attributing greater weight in defining antisemitism to the actual perceptions of the victims—bottom-up rather than top-down. As a basis for a valid definition, we need to demonstrate these perceptions empirically. This paper presents a structural analysis of the 2018 Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA) Survey. The study, conducted through the internet, included over 16,000 self-identified Jews in 12 European Union countries. I review the findings regarding the main contents of antisemitic expressions, the channels of transmission of antisemitism, and the identity of perpetrators. Using Similarity Structure Analysis (SSA), I suggest a new and better analytic typology of the main patterns of perceptions of contemporary antisemitism.
Topics
Genre
Geographic Coverage
Europe Austria Belgium Denmark Germany Hungary Italy France Spain Latvia Netherlands Poland United Kingdom
Original Language
Volume/Issue
8(1)
Page Number
4-42
Related
Experiences and perceptions of antisemitism: Second survey on discrimination and hate crime against Jews in the EU (Responding to)
DOI
Link
Link to article (paywalled), How Best to Define Antisemitism? A Structural Approach
Bibliographic Information
How Best to Define Antisemitism? A Structural Approach. 2024: 4-42. https://archive.jpr.org.uk/10.2979/ast.00002
