Home  / GLO20

Fixity and flux: A critique of competing approaches to researching contemporary Jewish identities

Author(s)

Publication Name

Publication Date

Abstract

Jewish identities are becoming increasingly pluralised due to internal dynamics within Judaism and wider social processes such as secularisation, globalisation and individualisation. However, empirical research on contemporary Jewish identities often continues to adopt restrictive methodological and conceptual approaches that reify Jewish identity and portray it as a ‘product’ for educational providers and others to pass to younger generations. Moreover, these approaches typically impose identities upon individuals, often as a form of collective affiliation, without addressing their personal significance. In response, this article argues for increased recognition of the multiple and fluid nature of personal identities in order to investigate the diverse ways in which Jews live and perform their Jewishness. Paying greater attention to personal identities facilitates recognition of the intersections between different forms of identity, enabling more complex understandings of the ways in which individuals both define their own identities and contribute to redefining the boundaries of Jewishness.

Topics

Genre

Geographic Coverage

Original Language

Volume/Issue

65(1)

Page Number

97-113

DOI

Link

Link to article (paywalled), Fixity and flux: A critique of competing approaches to researching contemporary Jewish identities
Link to download in university repository, Fixity and flux: A critique of competing approaches to researching contemporary Jewish identities

Bibliographic Information

Samson, Maxim GM, Vanderbeck, Robert M, Wood, Nichola Fixity and flux: A critique of competing approaches to researching contemporary Jewish identities. Social Compass. 2018: 97-113.  https://archive.jpr.org.uk/10.1177/0037768617747505