German Guilt, White Guilt: The Politics of Reforestation and the Return of the Gardening State. Response to Hannah Tzuberi, »Reforesting Jews: The German State and the Construction of 'New German Judaism'«
Author(s)
Publication Name
Publication Date
Abstract
This response puts Tzuberi's analysis into a broader comparative context. First, the post-1990 attempt to create Jews in the image of the liberal-secular German nation-state met considerable resistance by the Central Council of Jews in Germany. In addition, the majority of post-Soviet Jews showed no interest in liberal Jewish theology or the fantasy of reviving the German-Jewish past. Second, the milieu of Judaizing Germans (core architects of German-Jewish revivalism) shows a strong resemblance to other attempts of escaping colonial whiteness, including patterns of what has been called »ethnic fraud.« Third, in comparison to other cases of minority repatriation, the German practice of expiatory demographic engineering was relatively cost-intensive, but contributed considerably to the country's »nation re-branding« after reunification. Fourth, the German politics of reforestation vis-à-vis its Jewish community points to the rise of a post-migratory »gardening state,« heavily invested in regulating its diverse population through a policy mix of migration, education and surveillance.
Topics
Jewish - Non - Jewish Relations Jewish Revival Main Topic: Other Post-1989 Religion and State Immigration Diversity
Genre
Geographic Coverage
Original Language
Volume/Issue
27(2)
Page Number
225-239
Related
DOI
Link
Link to article (paywalled), German Guilt, White Guilt: The Politics of Reforestation and the Return of the Gardening State. Response to Hannah Tzuberi, »Reforesting Jews: The German State and the Construction of 'New German Judaism'«
Bibliographic Information
German Guilt, White Guilt: The Politics of Reforestation and the Return of the Gardening State. Response to Hannah Tzuberi, »Reforesting Jews: The German State and the Construction of 'New German Judaism'«. 2020: 225-239. https://archive.jpr.org.uk/10.1628/jsq-2020-0016
