Search results

Your search found 28 items
Sort: Relevance | Topics | Title | Author | Publication Year
Home  / Search Results
Author(s): Otova, Ildiko
Date: 2024
Abstract: In recent years, the fate of the Jews in Bulgaria during the Second World War has aroused the research interest of humanities scholars from various disciplines, with a number of studies published (see e.g., and many of the following cited (Avramov 2012. “Спасение” и падение. Микроикономика на държавния антисемитизъм в
България, 1940–1944 [“Rescue” and fall. Microeconomics of State Anti-semitism in Bulgaria, 1940–1944]. Sofia: Sofia University “St. Kl. Ohridski; Daneva 2013; Krsteva 2015; Koleva 2017)). Many rely on research on the construction of memory. At the same time, fewer research efforts seem to have focused on how the topic has become politicized in the years since 1989 (see e.g. Benatov 2013. “Debating the Fate of Bulgarian Jews during
World War II.” In Bringing the Dark Past to Light the Reception of the Holocaust in Postcommunist Europe, edited by John-Paul Himka, and Joanna Beata Michlic, 108–31. University of Nebraska Press; Ragaru 2020. Et les Juifs bulgaresfurent sauvе…Une histoire des savoirs sur la Shoah en Bulgarie. Paris: Science Po). The aim of this paper is to offer precisely this perspective on the topic of non/rescue, and in the last ten years. Politicization has traditionally been understood as the process of attributing salience to an issue of public interest through various channels such as political discourse and media, and in the presence of the multiple and diverse opinions associated with it (deWilde, Pieter. 2011. “No polity for old politics? A framework for analyzing the politicization of European
integration.” Journal of European Integration 33 (5): 559–75; de Wilde, Pieter, Anna Leupold, and Henning Schmidtke. 2016. “Introduction: the differentiated politicisation of European governance.” West European Politics 39 (1): 3–22). In some texts on the politicization of the migration crisis in Bulgaria in the years since 2012, the author shows how a topic can be politicized in the absence of political debate and in the context of a dominant
populist understanding, multiplied by various power actors – politicians, institutions, media and intellectuals (see e.g. Otova, Ildiko, and Evelina Staykova. 2022. Migration and Populism in Bulgaria. London: Routledge). For the purposes of this paper, by politicization the author will understand the blurring of ideological differences of interpretations of who the savior is in a populist consensus around the construction of the rescue narrative
for foreign policy use, but mostly as a nation-building narrative. The focus of this article is on the last ten years, in which the political interpretations and actions surrounding the commemoration of the 70th in 2013 and 75th in 2018 and the 80th anniversary in 2023 of the events surrounding the so-called rescue of Bulgarian Jews are particularly interesting. It is during these last years that populism has become the norm for the political scene in Bulgaria. Populism is not the obvious entrance to the topic, but it is the political framework within which the politicization of the topic of the rescue is developing, and a possible theoretical entrance. Populism became a persistent part of Bulgarian political life more than a decade after the beginning of the democratic changes of 1989. There are
several key factors involved in this process-exhaustion of the cleavages of the transition period, but especially the transformation of party politics into symbolic ones (Otova, Ildiko, and Evelina Staykova. 2022. Migration and Populism in Bulgaria. London: Routledge). Symbolic politics deal more with emotions and less with ratio and facts;
they build narratives that are often nationally affirming. The article does not claim to be exhaustive, especially in its presentation of historical facts. The limits of this rather political science approach are many. On the other hand, however, it adds to the research effort with a missing glimpse into the interpretations of the no/rescue theme and could open the field for further in-depth research.
Date: 2023
Author(s): Rothberg, Michael
Date: 2022
Author(s): Florian, Alexandru
Date: 2011
Date: 2012
Author(s): Brumlik, Micha
Date: 2000
Abstract: Als Ezer Weismann, der israelische Staatspräsident, Anfang des Jahres 1996 Deutschland besuchte, erregte er mit seiner Äußerung Aufsehen, er könne nicht begreifen, daß Juden noch immer in Deutschland leben wollten. Ignatz Bubis, der damalige Vorsitzende des Zentralrats der Juden in Deutschland, der sich dezidiert als ein deutscher Staatsbürger jüdischen Glaubens versteht, widersprach. - Wie sieht ein Jude der 68er Generation sein Leben in der Bundesrepublik? Micha Brumlik ist in der Bundesrepublik aufgewachsen, hier hat er sich politisch und publizistisch eingemischt. In seiner eindrücklichen Schilderung jüdischen Lebens in Deutschland nach dem Krieg beleuchtet er die neuerdings wieder viel diskutierte Frage, was jüdische Identität heute ausmacht. Dabei streift er nicht nur die Schmerzzonen deutsch-jüdischen Erinnerns der letzten Jahre, die mit den Namen Börneplatz, Fassbinder-Affäre, Bitburg und dem Holocaust-Mahnmal verbunden sind, er geht auch weiter zurück, erinnert sich der eigenen Kindheit in den fünfziger Jahren, um die Grundlagen eines jüdischen Selbstverständnisses freizulegen, das von der Fluchterfahrung der Eltern vor den Nazis bestimmt war. Zur Nachkriegsgeschichte gehört wesentlich auch das politisch empfindliche Verhältnis der Bundesrepublik zum Staat Israel. Micha Brumlik hat dort einige Zeit studiert und in einem Kibbuz gelebt. Er fragt nach dem Verhältnis eines nicht orthodox lebenden Juden zur Religion, denkt über den Zionismus und verschiedene Spielarten des Antizionismus nach, nimmt eine Neubewertung seines Engagements für die politische Linke vor - und kommt zu der Einsicht, daß er immer wieder zwischen allen Stühlen gelandet ist, landen mußte. In Brumliks Verknüpfung von erzählendem Rückblick und politischer Analyse wird nicht nur die Geschichte der Bundesrepublik auf besonders scharfsichtige Weise kenntlich. Hier zeigt sich auch, daß ein Leben als Jude in Deutschland - allen Anfeindungen, Sozialisationsbrüchen und Spannungen zum Trotz - ein starkes Selbstverständnis provozieren kann, das mit extremen Widersprüchen produktiv umgeht
Author(s): Bauman, Zygmunt
Date: 2008
Abstract: In the late nineteenth century the great European project of nation-building was set in motion. It was meant to end in a Europe of unified nation-states, each with its own language, history, traditions and a people undivided in its loyalty. The local or ‘merely ethnic’ communities would be effaced, subsumed into the homogeneous nation. Assimilation was the means whereby outsiders would become insiders, strangers would become citizens.

The Second World War, and the Holocaust, brought this project to its end, laying bare the contradiction at its heart. Outsiders could not be assimilated since their loyalty was, by definition, always voluntary and therefore always seen as untrustworthy. As the historical epitome of the European outsider, Jews accordingly remained suspect despite all their ingenious efforts to assimilate. They experienced first-hand the ambivalence of the assimilatory drive, which was, from their point of view, to become like everyone else, and, from their hosts’ point of view, to deepen belonging by emphasizing difference.

Nowhere were the challenges and miseries of this process more pronounced than in the demographically complex nations of East-Central Europ. With the disappearance of Eastern European Jewry, the drama of Jewish assimilation came to an end.

In post-war Europe Jewish assimilation has, with the demise of the crusading spirit of nationalism, dissolved into a mundane and generalized show of conformity that runs alongside postmodernity’s emphasis on a seemingly infinite variety of privatized identities and choices. The sting has been taken out of Jewish assimilation, not because it was achieved, but because the life-and-death pressures to homogenize are no longer there.

Those few generations of European Jews who were forced to wrestle with the contradictions of assimilation were arguably the pioneers of the postmodern condition, making visible the ambiguities that mark contemporary existence for all Europeans. It is this that counts as the Jews’ most profound contribution to contemporary European culture.
Date: 2014