Abstract: Holocaust distortions are central to contemporary antisemitic rhetoric, appearing across political ideologies and geographic contexts. Such distortions, often closely linked to collective memory processes, raise critical questions about the causal relationship between antisemitism and Holocaust narratives. Theoretical and conceptual work on secondary antisemitism suggests that modern antisemitism stems from ingroup-serving Holocaust distortions, motivated by collective guilt. However, social psychological research suggests that contemporary attitudes may shape historical representations, indicating that antisemitism could be a cause, rather than a consequence, of these distortions. In a longitudinal analysis of a quota-representative sample of the German and Polish populations, two countries with distinct Holocaust histories, we examined the bidirectional relationship between antisemitic prejudice and ingroup-serving Holocaust distortion. Using structural equation modeling, we assessed the reciprocal influence of antisemitism and Holocaust reinterpretation, with both national models showing good fit (comparative fit index > .98, root-mean-square error of approximation < .065, standardized root-mean-square residual < .04). By assessing participants’ perceptions of their ingroup’s emotions and behaviors during the Holocaust alongside contemporary antisemitic attitudes, our findings show that antisemitism actively influences biased Holocaust representations. These results challenge the premise of secondary antisemitism, highlighting that historical distortions often reflect current prejudices rather than driving them. Our findings underscore how collective memory can be adapted to justify present-day biases, emphasizing the dynamic interplay between historical narratives and contemporary intergroup attitudes.
Abstract: Wenn eine KI-generierte Anne Frank im Feed auftaucht, DJs in der Gaskammer auflegen, die AfD Tipps zur Ahnenforschung gibt und Israel zur neuen Chiffre des Bösen wird: Geschichtsbilder von jungen Menschen werden heute maßgeblich im Netz, durch Videospiele und digitale Anwendungen geprägt. Doch die Gefahren werden bislang noch viel zu wenig beleuchtet – und die Potenziale und Chancen, die sich durch digitale Geschichtsvermittlung ergeben, sind noch längst nicht voll ausgeschöpft.
In unserem Report „Der Holocaust als Meme“ stellen wir einige Beispiele geschichtsrevisionistischer Inhalte in digitalen Medien vor, die in unseren Augen eine breitere Öffentlichkeit brauchen – sei es, weil sie besonders große Reichweiten erzielen, besonders subtilen Strategien folgen oder zu schon bedenklich normalisierten Formen alternativhistorischer Erzählungen gehören. Die aufgeführten Beispiele und Analysen dienen dazu, zentrale Beobachtungen, wiederkehrende Muster und exemplarische Phänomene im Umgang mit Geschichte in digitalen Räumen zu veranschaulichen.
Ein besonderer Fokus liegt auf den Plattformen Instagram und TikTok, da sie zu den reichweitenstärksten und einflussreichsten Social-Media-Kanälen unter Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen zählen. Neben sozialen Medien beziehen wir uns auch auf digitale Spiele mit historischem Setting.
Abstract: While public antisemitism after 7 October prominently features references to Israel, forms of Holocaust denial and distortion remain very relevant and are deeply intertwined with other forms of antisemitism.
Acts and manifestations of Holocaust denial and distortion appear in various forms and are adopted by different milieus and groups to serve their own political or religious agenda, regardless of societal and country-specific context.
Our publication „Holocaust Distortion in Europe“ examines the alarming prevalence of Holocaust denial and distortion in Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, and Poland; demonstrating how antisemitic narratives adapt to societal crises, are exploited for political gain, often evade legal accountability, erode historical truth—with harmful consequences for Jewish communities, Holocaust survivors, and their descendants—and highlights the urgent need for coordinated action.
Abstract: CLe 10 octobre 2013, lors d’une réunion plénière à Toronto, l’Alliance internationale pour la mémoire de l’Holocauste (IHRA) a marqué un tournant dans la compréhension des manipulations historiques en introduisant l’expression « distorsion de la Shoah ». Cette nouvelle terminologie qui étend la réflexion sur les menaces posées par l’antisémitisme et le négationnisme, dépasse le simple ajout lexical. Elle reflète une prise de conscience accrue face à la complexité des discours visant à remettre en question la réalité historique de la Shoah.
Le « négationnisme », un mot inventé en 1987 par l’historien Henry Rousso dans son ouvrage Le Syndrome de Vichy, désigne les idées de ceux qui minimisent ou nient l’extermination des Juifs durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale. À l’époque, l’historien souhaitait rectifier l’usage inapproprié du terme « révisionnisme », souvent confondu avec celui de négationnisme, et rappeler que, dans une démarche scientifique, le révisionnisme se distingue clairement de ce dernier. Il expliquait alors :
Le révisionnisme de l’histoire étant une démarche classique chez les scientifiques, on préférera ici le barbarisme, moins élégant mais plus approprié, de « négationnisme », car il s’agit bien d’un système de pensée, d’une idéologie et non d’une démarche scientifique ou même simplement critique.
Le négationnisme, en tant qu’idéologie, cherche avant tout à effacer ou déformer la réalité de la Shoah. Toutefois, cette définition s’avère insuffisante pour désigner d’autres formes de falsifications historiques qui, plutôt que de nier directement l’événement, le réinterprètent de manière à le banaliser, le déformer ou le trivialiser…
Abstract: « Les mots n’appartiennent pas au ciel des idées. Qu’on le veuille ou non, ils ont des conséquences sur les faits. »
L’archevêque de Paris Jean-Marie Lustiger a offert en 1997 à l’un des plus grands historiens du génocide des Juifs, Saul Friedländer, une méditation sur le mal absolu et sur sa négation toujours répétée : « La Shoah est la noire lumière par laquelle il est possible de nommer par son nom l’horreur commise en Bosnie ou au Rwanda, les crimes de Pol Pot au Cambodge, ceux du génocide arménien. […] Dès lors, le négationnisme qui dénie les faits ou le révisionnisme qui les « trafique » en faisant des Juifs les artisans de leur propre destruction, ne sont pas à inscrire au compte du scepticisme ou de la relativité des opinions humaines. Ils deviennent significatifs d’une tentation universelle. Ils sont des figures du mensonge qui toujours nie pour fuir la vérité. »
Vingt-cinq ans plus tard, le 20 janvier 2022, l’Assemblée générale de l’ONU a adopté par les voix de 193 pays (l’Iran s’étant abstenu) une résolution sur la « négation [denial] et la déformation de l’Holocauste » (Holocaust distorsion) qui s’appuie terme à terme sur la convention de 1948 « sur la prévention et la répression du crime de génocide » : « Notant que le négationnisme fait référence au discours et à la propagande qui nient la réalité historique et l’ampleur de l’extermination des Juifs par les nazis et leurs complices pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, connue sous le nom d’Holocauste ou Shoah…
Topics: October 7 2023 attacks + aftermath, Antisemitism, Antisemitism: Far right, Holocaust Denial, AI, Discourse and Discourse Analysis, Antisemitism: Discourse, Social Media, Internet, Main Topic: Antisemitism, Holocaust: Distortion
Abstract: Reflecting on the months since the recent October 7 attack, rarely has the theme of Holocaust Memorial Day 2024, ‘The Fragility of Freedom’, felt so poignant. Communities globally experienced the shattering of presumed security, and antisemitic incidents responsively spiked.
Antisemitism rose across both mainstream and fringe social media platforms, and communities resultantly reported a rise in insecurity and fear. CCOA constituent countries have recorded significant rises in antisemitic incidents, including an immediate 240% increase in Germany, a three-fold rise in France, and a marked increase in Italy.
The antisemitism landscape, including Holocaust denial and distortion, had shifted so drastically since October 7 that previous assumptions and understands now demand re-examination. In the run up to Holocaust Memorial Day 2024, this research compilation by members of the Coalition to Counter Online Antisemitism offers a vital contemporary examination of the current and emergent issues facing Holocaust denial and distortion online. As unique forms of antisemitism, denial and distortion are a tool of historical revisionism which specifically targets Jews, eroding Jewish experience and threatening democracy.
Across different geographies and knowledge fields, this compilation unites experts around the central and sustained proliferation of Holocaust denial and distortion on social media.
Abstract: In the early years of the 21st century it appeared that the memory of the Holocaust was secure in Western Europe; that, in order to gain entry into the European Union, the countries of Eastern Europe would have to acknowledge their compatriots' complicity in genocide. Fifteen year later, the landscape looks starkly different. Shedding fresh light on these developments, The Perversion of Holocaust Memory explores the politicization and distortion of Holocaust remembrance since 1989.
This innovative book opens with an analysis of events across Europe which buttressed confidence in the stability of Holocaust memory and brought home the full extent of nations' participation in the Final Solution. And yet, as Judith M. Hughes reveals in later chapters, mainstream accountability began to crumble as the 21st century progressed: German and Jewish suffering was equated; anti-Semitic rhetoric re-entered contemporary discourse; populist leaders side-stepped inconvenient facts; and, more recently with the revival of ethno-nationalism, Holocaust remembrance has been caught in the backlash of the European refugee crisis.
The four countries analyzed here – France, Germany, Hungary, and Poland – could all claim to be victims of Nazi Germany, the Allies or the Communist Soviet Union but they were also all perpetrators. Ultimately, it is this complex legacy which Hughes adroitly untangles in her sophisticated study of Holocaust memory in modern Europe.
Abstract: This article analyses the British left’s response to allegations of antisemitism within the UK Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership. It uses as its foil a collection of essays on the topic written over the course of the Corbyn era for leading online outlets of the contemporary Anglo-American left, and given away as a free e-book by Verso, the world’s biggest leftist publisher, during the 2019 British election campaign. On the basis of this collection, the article suggests that the Labour antisemitism crisis was the culmination of a long process of political and theoretical degeneration within the left. It argues that the tendency to reduce of the question of antisemitism to that of class “interests,” with antisemitism understood primarily as an “instrument” used by the powerful to divide the “oppressed,” leaves many leftists unable to comprehend the possibility of exterminatory antisemitism as an end-in-itself. The appeal of this approach lies in the apparent alibi against antisemitism it provides for those on the left, like Corbyn, whose interests supposedly coincide with those of “the oppressed,” and means that accusations of antisemitism within the left can be similarly denounced as cover for the underlying ‘interests’ of those making the accusation. The article argues that the insistence that the State of Israel is “a racist endeavour,” a claim which lay at the heart of the Labour antisemitism dispute, rests upon an arbitrary and ahistorical rejection of the notion of Jewish peoplehood. This critique itself draws upon a long history of right-nationalist and liberal-republican antisemitism in which Jews were viewed as an illegitimate “anti-nation,” and in its partiality is radically distinct from a critique of the nation-state as such. The article suggests that this same partiality and ahistoricity reappears in the inability of a class instrumentalist perspective to apprehend the intrinsic, rather than extrinsic, relationship between Israel and antisemitism, and the genocidal antisemitism of the Holocaust in particular.
