Abstract: The thesis is based on three starting points. The first is on the
 acknowledgement of the lamentable condition of buildings of Jewish-related
 heritage in cities with a multicultural past across the present-day former Soviet
 Union. The second is on the acknowledgement of a slow process of gradual
 recognition of these traces as examples of tangible heritage and a provisional
 resource for heritage commodification. The third is the on the
 acknowledgement of ‘heritage’, ‘memory’ and ‘space’ as phenomena that are
 subject to manipulation on various levels.
 After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the understanding of what
 constitutes national heritage in the newly-appeared independent states has
 conformed to correspond with the interpretations and values of national histories.
 In managerial terms some immovable heritage of ethnic minorities has been
 returned to the symbolic successors of previous owners. This defined provisional
 sources of funding for partial renovation of this heritage, as well as its use. The
 remaining sites, the majority of which are monuments protected by the state, most
 frequently stay unattended. In order to design policy recommendations to improve
 the situation, a complex understanding of factors that influence heritage protection,
 interpretation, and promotion in the post-Soviet space is needed.
 Within this state of affairs, the thesis aims to analyze agency behind
 'top-down' policies and 'down-up' grass-roots initiatives towards
 (non)interpretation of Jewish-related heritage sites in Chişinǎu (Moldova),
 Odessa and L’viv (Ukraine) and Minsk (Belarus). This selection of cities is
 chosen to reveal the multiplicity of factors that determine apparent similarity in
 heritage condition and management in the post-Soviet space, but instead reveal
 diverse dynamics of interaction between heritage and politics; heritage and
 nationalism; heritage and civil society, etc.
 The methodology utilized here includes archival search, participant
 observation, media and expert opinion analysis, as well as examination of
 museum exhibitions. The fieldwork included data collection on the actual
 condition of Jewish heritage in the cities under discussion and interviews with
 various agents. Elite interviews were analyzed as basis for authoritative
 heritage discourse before discussing actual heritage projects in these cities.
 Based on interdisciplinary analysis, the thesis provides an embracing
 overview of the broad spectrum of agency behind Jewish heritage-related
 initiatives (or their absence). It then offers recommendations for the
 advancement of managerial strategies.