Search results

Your search found 6 items
Sort: Relevance | Topics | Title | Author | Publication Year
Home  / Search Results
Date: 2020
Abstract: The spread of hate speech and anti-Semitic content has become endemic to social media. Faced with a torrent of violent and offensive content, nations in Europe have begun to take measures to remove such content from social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter. However, these measures have failed to curtail the spread, and possible impact of anti-Semitic content. Notably, violence breeds violence and calls for action against Jewish minorities soon lead to calls for violence against other ethnic or racial minorities. Online anti-Semitism thus drives social tensions and harms social cohesion. Yet the spread of online anti-Semitism also has international ramifications as conspiracy theories and disinformation campaigns now often focus on WWII and the Holocaust. On Nov 29, 2019, the Oxford Digital Diplomacy Research Group (DigDiploROx) held a one-day symposium at the European Commission in Brussels. The symposium brought together diplomats, EU officials, academics and civil society organizations in order to search for new ways to combat the rise in online anti-Semitism. This policy brief offers an overview of the day’s discussions, the challenges identified and a set of solutions that may aid nations looking to stem the flow of antiSemitic content online. Notably, these solutions, or recommendations, are not limited to the realm of anti-Semitism and can to help combat all forms of discrimination, hate and bigotry online. Chief among these recommendations is the need for a multi-stakeholder solution that brings together governments, multilateral organisations, academic institutions, tech companies and NGOs. For the EU itself, there is a need to increase collaborations between units dedicated to fighting online crime, terrorism and anti-Semitism. This would enable the EU to share skills, resources and working procedures. Moreover, the EU must adopt technological solutions, such as automation, to identify, flag and remove hateful content in the quickest way possible. The EU could also redefine its main activities - rather than combat incitement to violence online, it may attempt to tackle incitement to hate, given that hate metastases online to calls for violence. Finally, the EU should deepen its awareness to the potential harm of search engines. These offer access to content that has already been removed by social media companies. Moreover, search engines serve as a gateway to hateful content. The EU should thus deepen is collaborations with companies such as Google and Yahoo, and not just Facebook or Twitter. It should be noted that social media companies opted not to take part in the symposium demonstrating that the solution to hate speech and rising anti-Semitism may be in legislation and not just in collaboration. The rest of this brief consists of five parts. The first offers an up-to-date analysis of the prevalence of anti-Semitic content online. The second, discuss the national and international implications of this prevalence. The third part stresses the need for a multi-stakeholder solution while the fourth offers an overview of the presentations made at the symposium. The final section includes a set of policy recommendations that should be adopted by the EU and its members states.
Date: 2020
Abstract:
Статья посвящена анализу инструментального использования темы антисемитизма в официальном дискурсе и информационно-пропагандистских кампаниях, сопровождавших обострение российско-украинских отношений и начало вооруженного конфликта весной 2014 г. Анализ свидетельствует о чрезвычайно важном месте, которое занимала гиперболизированная проблема антисемитизма в обосновании активного российского вмешательства в политические процессы в Украине. Эта проблематика рассматривается в историческом контексте: в статье прослеживаются истоки информационных кампаний, инструментализующих антисемитизм в контексте российско-украинских отношений в предшествовавшие годы. Автор указывает на постепенный рост значения этой темы, а также анализирует причины, по которым она приобрела столь
важное значение в ходе российско-украинского конфликта. Кроме того автор обращает внимание на опасность инструментализации темы антисемитизма в пропагандистской риторике и социально-событийной инженерии, поскольку это может привести к реальному усилению антисемитизма
Author(s): Just, Thomas
Date: 2015