Home  / BJPA197

Endthoughts: A Liberal Defense of Judgmentalism

Author(s)

Steven M. Cohen

Publication Name

Sh'ma: A Journal of Jewish Ideas

Publication Date

Publisher

CLAL: the National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership

Abstract

Steven Cohen responds to David Adler's critique (Sh'ma vol.26/no.511) that his earlier article on intermarriage and Jewish continuity (December 1994 issue of Moment) was racist and judgmental. The Jewish people's historical emphasis on group solidarity, as expressed through marrying Jews and making friends with Jews, is not racist, but tribalist, and applies entirely to the private sphere. Judgment is part and parcel of a long rabbinic tradition that enjoins us not only to judge, but to reproach and reprove. We may disagree about what makes a Jew strong or good (or weak or bad). But such distinctions exist and we ought to articulate our judgment as to who or what exemplifies those characteristics. American Judaism must not lose its transcendental power, its claim to authenticity, its majestic links to the past and the future, and its ability to provide nurturing, meaningful communities. It must find a stance that is somewhat strict, somewhat demanding, and somewhat at variance with the current Zeitgeist, a task that definitely demands both judgment and judgmentalism.

Editor

Cardin, Nina Beth

Geographic Coverage

United States

Copyright Info

Download for personal use, freely distribute link

BJPA Record

Bibliographic Information

Endthoughts: A Liberal Defense of Judgmentalism. 1996:  https://archive.jpr.org.uk/object-bjpa197
Result from