Willed Ignorance: Reflections on academic free speech, occasioned by the David Miller case
Author(s)
Publication Name
Publication Date
Abstract
The David Miller case raises the question, does liberal free speech doctrine require academics to defend the antisemitic conspiracy-talk of a sociology professor? The article opens with a discussion of Louise Glück's poem ‘A Myth of Innocence’, and then proceeds towards an answer to this question, pausing to address details of the Miller case itself when the general argument requires it to do so.
Topics
Genre
Geographic Coverage
Copyright Info
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Original Language
Volume/Issue
75(1)
Page Number / Article Number
1–44
DOI
Bibliographic Information
Willed Ignorance: Reflections on academic free speech, occasioned by the David Miller case. 2022: 1–44. https://archive.jpr.org.uk/10.1093/clp/cuac001
